home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Path: FreeNet.Carleton.CA!an171
- From: an171@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Anthony Hill)
- Subject: Re: SupraExpress 28,800
- Message-ID: <DLtM9w.MFs@freenet.carleton.ca>
- Sender: an171@freenet2.carleton.ca (Anthony Hill)
- Reply-To: an171@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Anthony Hill)
- Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
- References: <DLrtBG.En2@netcore.ca> <eric-2601960024440001@sobt.accessorl.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 03:41:55 GMT
-
-
- Eric Shaw (eric@accessorl.net) writes:
- > In article <DLrtBG.En2@netcore.ca>, hr25@netcore.ca (Alan Henderson) wrote:
- >>What's the difference between the SupraExpress 28,800 and the
- >>SupraFaxmodem 28,800? Can the the former be upgraded to 1.300-13? I'm
- >>thinking I may not have got the bargain I thought. Thanks for any
- >>light you can shed on this matter.
- >
- > The largest differences are
- >
- > 1. No Flash ROM, so no, you can't upgrade.
- > 2. No 2-3 digit display on the front.
- > 3. No Caller ID
- > 4. No Silent Answer or Adaptive answer
-
- Hmm, may just be a nasty rumor, but does anyone know if it's true
- that the SupraExpress does NOT have NVRAM? (I'm not talking about FlashROM
- here, I'm talking about NVRAM in the classic modem sense of the term, eg.
- where you store the modems settings). Anyway, Supra claims that their
- Express model is very similar to the SupraFAXmodem, but I have yet to see
- anyone with both who found this to be true. In fact, I can't say I've
- even found someone who owned an Express who was satisfied at all, while
- in general comments about the SFM were pretty good.
-
- Anthony
-
- --
- Anthony Hill | an171@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
-